FAIRINO FR10 vs. KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300: Affordable 10 kg Cobot vs. Premium German Industrial Automation
The FAIRINO FR10 and KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 occupy a highly competitive segment of the collaborative-robot market. Both are six-axis cobots designed for medium-payload automation, including machine tending, material handling, packaging, assembly, inspection, welding and light palletizing.
On paper, their core performance specifications are remarkably close. The FAIRINO has a 10 kg rated payload, while the KUKA is rated for 11 kg. The FR10 reaches 1,400 mm, giving it 100 mm more reach than the KUKA’s 1,300 mm working envelope. Both manufacturers publish a pose repeatability of ±0.05 mm.
The major difference is price and automation philosophy.
FAIRINO USA publicly lists the FR10 at $10,199. The KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 is generally sold through quotations, but a current public European marketplace listing prices it at €29,705 excluding VAT—approximately $33,835 at an exchange rate of about $1.139 per euro.
That means the KUKA’s publicly visible robot price is approximately $23,636 higher than the FAIRINO price before VAT, U.S. import costs, integration or optional software. The FR10 is approximately 70% less expensive on this direct price comparison.
However, the KUKA offers capabilities and ecosystem advantages that cannot be evaluated through price alone. It includes integrated joint torque sensors in every axis, the KUKA ARGUS safety architecture, the KR C5 micro-2 controller and the iiQKA.OS2 software platform. It can be especially attractive to manufacturers already operating KUKA robots and engineering systems.
The central purchasing decision is therefore:
Choose the FAIRINO FR10 when price, longer reach, comparable repeatability and faster return on investment are the main priorities.
Choose the KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 when integrated torque sensing, KUKA platform standardization and access to a mature global industrial-automation ecosystem justify the higher investment.
FAIRINO FR10 vs. KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300: Quick Comparison
Specification | FAIRINO FR10 | KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 |
Public robot price | $10,199 USD | €29,705 excluding VAT |
Approximate price in USD | $10,199 | Approximately $33,835 |
Price source | FAIRINO USA public product page | Unchained Robotics public marketplace |
Price type | Direct public U.S. price | European reseller price, not official global MSRP |
Rated payload | 10 kg | 11 kg |
Published maximum payload | 14 kg | 11.72 kg at 0 mm center of mass |
Maximum reach | 1,400 mm | 1,300 mm |
Degrees of freedom | 6 | 6 |
Pose repeatability | ±0.05 mm | ±0.05 mm |
Typical TCP speed | 1.5 m/s | Application and configuration dependent |
Robot-arm weight | Approximately 40 kg | Approximately 46.3 kg |
Footprint | 275 × 275 mm | |
Protection rating | IP54; IP65 optional | IP54 |
Noise | Below 65 dB | Not publicly specified |
Mounting | Any orientation | Floor, ceiling, wall or desired angle |
Operating temperature | 0–45°C | 0–45°C |
Operating humidity | Up to 90% RH, non-condensing | Confirm for final configuration |
Tool power | 24 V / 1.5 A | Configuration dependent |
I/O | 16 DI, 16 DO, 2 AI, 2 AO and 2 high-speed pulse inputs | 16 DI and 16 DO listed at controller |
Industrial communication | TCP/IP, Ethernet and integration options | EtherCAT, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP and EtherCAT Slave options |
Controller | FAIRINO controller | KR C5 micro-2 |
Programming | Teach pendant, Web App and drag teaching | iiQKA.OS2, smartPAD pro and hand guiding |
Joint torque sensing | Collaborative collision and force-related functions; configuration dependent | Integrated torque sensor in every axis |
Safety system | Collaborative safety functions; application risk assessment required | KUKA ARGUS safety system; application risk assessment required |
Manufacturer warranty | 18 months | Contract and regional quotation dependent |
Published expected lifetime | 50,000 hours | No directly comparable public numeric figure |
U.S. support | FAIRINO USA and Devonics technical support | KUKA and authorized partner network |
U.S. availability | Direct FAIRINO USA product page | Quote through KUKA or regional partner |
Lead time | Confirm at time of order | Configuration and regional quotation dependent |
Best advantage | Price, reach and value | Joint sensing and KUKA ecosystem |
Price Comparison
Price is the clearest difference between these robots.
FAIRINO FR10 Price
FAIRINO USA publicly lists the FR10 at:
$10,199 USD
This is a visible product price rather than an unpublished estimate. The FAIRINO USA product page also provides an add-to-cart option and a quotation channel.
Buyers should still confirm precisely what is included. Robot prices may or may not include every item required for a production-ready cell, such as:
Controller
Teach pendant
Safety box
Robot cable
Mounting hardware
End effector
Vision system
Safety scanner
Pedestal
Installation
Application programming
Freight
Taxes
The $10,199 price nevertheless establishes a clear and verifiable starting point for budget planning.
KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 Price
KUKA does not publish one universal global MSRP on its main product page. Pricing normally depends on the country, configuration, software options and sales channel.
Unchained Robotics currently lists the KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 at:
€29,705 excluding VAT
At an indicative EUR/USD exchange rate of approximately 1.139, this is equivalent to approximately:
$33,835 USD excluding VAT
The dollar conversion is provided only for comparison. Exchange rates change, and it should not be interpreted as a guaranteed U.S. selling price.
Direct Price Difference
Using the indicative currency conversion:
Price Calculation | Amount |
FAIRINO FR10 | $10,199 |
KUKA approximate converted price | $33,835 |
Approximate price difference | $23,636 |
FAIRINO price reduction relative to KUKA | Approximately 70% |
A manufacturer could theoretically purchase three FR10 robot arms for less than the public marketplace price of one KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300. That does not mean three complete FAIRINO cells would necessarily cost less than one KUKA cell, because tooling, safety and integration costs must also be considered. However, it illustrates the scale of the difference in robot acquisition cost.
What the Price Does Not Include
The final installed cost of either system can be significantly higher than the arm price. A complete project may require:
Engineering
Risk assessment
End-of-arm tooling
Machine vision
PLC communication
Safety equipment
Fixtures
Electrical work
Operator training
Preventive-maintenance planning
Shipping and import costs
A fair procurement process should compare complete quotations with matching scopes rather than comparing a bare robot price against a fully configured automation package.
Purchase-price winner: FAIRINO FR10
Payload Comparison
The FAIRINO FR10 has a rated payload of 10 kg. KUKA rates the LBR iisy 11 R1300 for 11 kg.
FAIRINO FR10 rated payload: 10 kg
KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 rated payload: 11 kg
The KUKA therefore has a one-kilogram nominal advantage.
FAIRINO also publishes a maximum FR10 payload of 14 kg. KUKA documentation specifies a maximum payload of 11.72 kg when the center of mass is at 0 mm.
These maximum figures require careful interpretation. Maximum payload is not necessarily available across the full working envelope or with an offset load. The end effector’s weight, center of gravity, inertia and operating speed can substantially affect allowable performance.
A payload calculation must include:
Gripper or process tool
Tool changer
Camera and lighting
Brackets
Cables and hoses
Workpiece
Vacuum components
Any wrist-mounted sensors
For example, a 3 kg gripper carrying an 8 kg part produces an 11 kg combined payload before accounting for brackets and cables. That exceeds the rated payload of the FR10 and exactly reaches the KUKA’s rated capacity.
If the complete tool-and-part package stays below 10 kg, both robots may be suitable. If the application consistently requires more than 10 kg at a significant offset, the KUKA’s extra nominal capacity may help, but the precise load case must be validated.
FAIRINO’s 14 kg maximum figure should not be treated as equivalent to a 14 kg nominal rating. Similarly, KUKA states that its 11.72 kg maximum applies only at a 0 mm center-of-mass position. Engineering verification remains essential.
Rated-payload winner: KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300
Reach and Working Envelope
The FAIRINO FR10 provides a maximum reach of 1,400 mm. The KUKA reaches 1,300 mm.
FAIRINO FR10: 1,400 mm
KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300: 1,300 mm
Difference: 100 mm in favor of FAIRINO
A 100 mm difference may appear small, but it can determine whether a robot reaches a fixture, machine door, pallet corner or inspection point without changing the mounting arrangement.
The FR10’s additional reach can provide practical advantages in:
Deep CNC-machine access
Dual-machine tending
Conveyor transfer
Multi-fixture assembly
Packaging lines
Welding larger parts
Pallet handling
Inspection of wide components
Applications with a central robot serving several stations
Maximum reach alone does not define the useful working envelope. Robot geometry, joint limits, singularities and the required tool orientation must also be considered.
The correct design process should simulate the complete motion path, including:
Pick position
Approach path
Machine entry
Process position
Retract path
Place position
Avoidance of doors and fixtures
Cable movement
Emergency and maintenance access
The FR10 wins the maximum-reach comparison, but both robots should be modeled in the proposed cell before purchasing.
Reach winner: FAIRINO FR10
Repeatability and Precision
Both robots publish the same pose-repeatability figure:
FAIRINO FR10: ±0.05 mm
KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300: ±0.05 mm according to ISO 9283
Neither robot has a numerical advantage in this category.
A ±0.05 mm repeatability specification is suitable for many common industrial applications, including:
Machine tending
Repetitive assembly
Packaging
Pick-and-place
Inspection
Material handling
Screwdriving
Welding
Palletizing
Repeatability should not be confused with absolute accuracy. A robot can return consistently to a taught point while still having a larger difference between its programmed coordinates and its actual physical position.
Real application precision is affected by:
Robot calibration
Mounting rigidity
Tool-center-point calibration
Payload
Load offset
Temperature
End-effector deflection
Fixture variation
Vision calibration
Process forces
Mechanical wear
If a process requires accurate positioning relative to randomly located parts, machine vision, probing or external calibration may be more important than a small difference in the robot’s repeatability specification.
Repeatability result: Tie
Speed and Cycle-Time Potential
The FAIRINO FR10 has a published typical TCP speed of 1.5 m/s.
KUKA emphasizes high joint speeds and industrial performance but does not provide one directly comparable TCP-speed value on the public product page. Published KUKA joint-speed values for the LBR iisy 11 R1300 range from 200 degrees per second on the first axes to 430 degrees per second on axis six.
A direct cycle-time winner cannot be selected from these values alone. TCP speed and joint speed measure different things, and the fastest theoretical movement may not be allowed in a collaborative application.
Real cycle time depends on:
Travel distance
Payload
Acceleration
Deceleration
Tool orientation
Safety mode
Human proximity
Gripper actuation
Machine processing time
Vision processing
PLC communication
Required settling time
For a high-output project, buyers should ask both vendors to run the same representative cycle with the intended payload and safety conditions.
Robot Weight and Installation
The FAIRINO FR10 weighs approximately 40 kg without its cable. The KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 weighs approximately 46.3 kg.
FAIRINO FR10: approximately 40 kg
KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300: approximately 46.3 kg
Difference: approximately 6.3 kg
The FR10 is about 14% lighter.
Both robots require proper lifting procedures. Neither should be treated as a small tabletop device that one person can casually carry between stations.
The FR10’s lower weight may still reduce requirements for:
Mobile carts
Pedestals
Wall-mounting structures
Ceiling frames
Reconfiguration
Transport between production lines
The KUKA’s published footprint is 275 × 275 mm, while the FR10 has a listed footprint of 190 mm. Exact bolt patterns and structural loads should be checked before manufacturing a base.
Weight and compact-installation winner: FAIRINO FR10
IP Rating and Environmental Protection
Both standard robot arms are rated IP54.
An IP54 rating indicates protection against limited dust ingress and water splashes. It does not mean that the robot is waterproof, suitable for high-pressure washdown or approved for every dusty or chemically aggressive environment.
FAIRINO lists an optional IP65 version of the FR10. This can provide stronger environmental protection when properly specified in the order.
The KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 is listed at IP54. KUKA also offers a separate cleanroom version, the LBR iisy 11 R1300 CR, for specialized applications. The cleanroom model is not the same product as the standard robot compared in this article and may have different pricing and configuration requirements.
The complete automation cell must be evaluated. A protected robot arm does not protect an unsealed controller, teach pendant, connector, camera or gripper.
Standard protection result: Tie at IP54Optional higher-ingress-protection advantage: FAIRINO FR10
Controller and Programming
FAIRINO FR10 Programming
The FR10 supports FAIRINO’s teach pendant, mobile terminal Web App, graphical programming and drag teaching.
This approach is designed to make programming accessible to:
Small manufacturers
First-time robot users
System integrators
Maintenance technicians
Educational institutions
Research laboratories
The browser-based environment can simplify access because users can work through a familiar graphical interface rather than relying exclusively on conventional industrial robot programming.
FAIRINO also supports integration and secondary development options for more advanced applications. The open approach can be attractive to companies that want flexibility without committing to a high-cost proprietary engineering environment.
KUKA LBR iisy Programming
The KUKA LBR iisy uses the KR C5 micro-2 controller and iiQKA.OS2 operating system. KUKA combines hand guiding with the smartPAD pro and a broader engineering platform.
KUKA highlights:
Guided workflows
Programming templates
Diagnostic tools
Hand-guided teaching
iiQWorks engineering
iiQWorks.Sim simulation
Virtual commissioning
PLC integration
Common engineering across compatible KUKA platforms
For a new user, the LBR iisy is intended to provide a simpler introduction to KUKA automation than a traditional industrial robot. For an experienced KUKA facility, it offers the additional benefit of remaining inside an established engineering and service ecosystem.
The FR10 favors accessibility and price. The KUKA favors platform standardization and deeper integration with the wider KUKA environment.
Force Sensing and Joint Torque Sensors
One of the KUKA’s most important technical advantages is integrated torque sensing in every axis.
KUKA states that this supports:
Real-time external-force detection
Hand guiding
Force-controlled assembly
Joining processes
Collision detection
Collaborative operation
Process optimization
The FR10 supports collaborative safety behavior, drag teaching and collision-related functions. However, buyers requiring advanced force-controlled processes should compare the exact sensing architecture, control modes, available software interfaces and process packages.
Applications that may benefit from the KUKA’s joint torque sensors include:
Precision insertion
Connector assembly
Surface contact
Force-controlled joining
Sensitive handling
Manual guidance
Adaptive assembly
An external force-torque sensor can also be added to a robot when the process requires more specialized wrist-level measurement. This creates an additional cost and integration requirement that should be included in the comparison.
Integrated torque-sensing winner: KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300
Safety and Human-Robot Collaboration
Both robots are collaborative robots, but neither automatically makes every application safe.
KUKA lists the ARGUS safety system, integrated safety monitoring and support for collaborative, hybrid and semi-automated production concepts. Published technical documentation also identifies Category 3 and Performance Level d in accordance with EN ISO 13849-1.
The FR10 includes collaborative safety functions intended to support operation around people. The exact safety configuration and required external devices depend on the application.
A complete risk assessment must consider:
Robot speed
Payload
Tool geometry
Sharp edges
Workpiece temperature
Crushing and trapping points
Stored energy
Machine hazards
Welding or cutting processes
Human access
Possible part release
Required stopping distance
A cobot carrying a sharp metal component, welding torch or heavy gripper may still require guarding, safety scanners or reduced-speed zones.
Safety must be assessed for the complete system, not only the robot arm.
I/O and Communication
FAIRINO’s FR10 product information lists:
16 digital inputs
16 digital outputs
2 analog inputs
2 analog outputs
2 high-speed pulse inputs
24 V / 1.5 A tool power
TCP/IP communication
100 Mbps network transfer
Standard Power over Ethernet
The KUKA marketplace specification lists:
16 digital inputs
16 digital outputs
EtherCAT
PROFINET
EtherNet/IP
EtherCAT Slave
KR C5 micro control architecture
Some fieldbus interfaces, software functions or licenses may be optional. The final quotation should identify exactly which communication protocols are included.
The FAIRINO offers a strong I/O specification for its price. The KUKA offers a mature industrial integration environment that may reduce engineering effort in facilities using common PLC and fieldbus architectures.
Machine Tending Comparison
Machine tending is one of the strongest applications for both robots.
The FR10 offers:
1,400 mm reach
10 kg rated payload
±0.05 mm repeatability
1.5 m/s typical TCP speed
Compact footprint
Low acquisition cost
The KUKA offers:
11 kg rated payload
1,300 mm reach
±0.05 mm repeatability
Integrated torque sensing
Industrial fieldbus support
KUKA controller and software ecosystem
The FR10’s additional 100 mm reach may help it enter deeper machines or serve two adjacent stations. Its lower price can make automated machine tending financially practical for smaller CNC shops.
The KUKA may be preferable when the factory already uses KUKA equipment, requires its safety architecture or benefits from joint-torque sensing during loading and insertion.
Best machine-tending value: FAIRINO FR10Best fit for a KUKA-standardized factory: KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300
Palletizing and Packaging
Both robots can handle light palletizing and packaging applications within their payload and reach limitations.
The FR10’s 1,400 mm reach provides a small geometric advantage. Its 10 kg rated capacity is sufficient for many cartons, bags, trays and containers after accounting for gripper weight.
The KUKA provides an additional kilogram of nominal payload. Its marketplace listing specifically identifies palletizing as one of the LBR iisy 11 R1300’s intended applications.
Neither robot should be selected for a palletizing system based only on maximum reach. The required pallet height, box dimensions, gripper size, lifting path and cycle rate must be simulated.
For taller pallets or heavier products, a larger-payload robot, linear axis or lifting column may be required.
Welding Applications
FAIRINO promotes the FR10 for welding, and KUKA identifies MIG/MAG welding among the LBR iisy family’s applications.
The FR10’s lower price can be highly attractive to fabrication shops seeking an affordable robotic-welding platform. The longer 1,400 mm reach may also help cover larger workpieces.
The KUKA brings an industrial platform, established integration environment and joint sensing. It may be preferred by manufacturers that prioritize standardized engineering, global service and compatibility with existing KUKA production systems.
The robot is only one element of a welding cell. A complete project may include:
Welding power source
Torch
Wire feeder
Cable management
Positioner
Welding table
Fume extraction
Safety enclosure
Process communication
Programming
Operator training
The final comparison should therefore use the complete installed welding-cell cost.
Assembly and Screwdriving
Both robots provide ±0.05 mm repeatability and can be used for assembly and screwdriving.
The FR10 provides a cost-effective platform for:
Repetitive component placement
Screwdriving
Parts handling
Fixture loading
Packaging assembly
Basic insertion processes
The KUKA’s joint torque sensors can create an advantage for:
Force-sensitive insertion
Contact detection
Guided assembly
Joining operations
Applications requiring external-force monitoring
Precision assembly may still require compliance devices, wrist force sensors, machine vision or specially designed fixtures.
Inspection and Quality Control
Both robots can position cameras, scanners and measurement equipment.
The FR10’s 1,400 mm reach can cover wide parts or multiple inspection fixtures. Its lower purchase price may allow a manufacturer to invest more of the project budget in high-quality cameras, lenses, lighting and analysis software.
The KUKA offers a sophisticated industrial platform and strong integration options. Its joint sensors may also be useful in inspection processes that require controlled contact.
For non-contact vision inspection, the camera and lighting system often influence accuracy more than the small differences between suitable robot arms.
Total Cost of Ownership
The FAIRINO’s lower purchase price does not automatically guarantee the lowest total cost, and the KUKA’s premium price does not automatically guarantee the best productivity.
A complete total-cost-of-ownership analysis should include:
Robot and controller
Software and licenses
Gripper or process tool
Vision system
Safety equipment
Pedestal or mobile base
Machine interface
Engineering
Installation
Training
Maintenance
Spare parts
Production downtime
Shipping and taxes
Future redeployment
The FR10 begins with an approximately $23,636 lower arm price based on the current public KUKA marketplace listing and indicative currency conversion. That is a substantial financial advantage.
The KUKA can recover part of its price premium when a company already has trained KUKA personnel, compatible engineering tools, spare-parts procedures and service relationships. Standardization can reduce hidden engineering and support costs across multiple facilities.
Which Robot Is Better for Small and Medium Manufacturers?
For many small and medium manufacturers, the FAIRINO FR10 offers the better overall value.
Its principal advantages are:
$10,199 public U.S. price
10 kg rated payload
14 kg published maximum
1,400 mm reach
±0.05 mm repeatability
Approximately 40 kg arm weight
1.5 m/s typical TCP speed
Strong I/O specification
Optional IP65 protection
Browser-based programming
U.S.-based FAIRINO availability and support
The lower price reduces the risk of a first automation project and can shorten the payback period.
Which Robot Is Better for Existing KUKA Facilities?
The KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 is likely the stronger strategic choice when the factory already uses KUKA equipment.
Its advantages include:
KR C5 micro-2 controller
iiQKA.OS2 software
iiQWorks engineering environment
Integrated joint torque sensing
KUKA ARGUS safety system
Industrial fieldbus integration
KUKA training and service network
Common platform strategy across automation projects
The value of standardization may justify the higher purchase price in a large industrial environment.
FAIRINO FR10 Advantages
Approximately 70% lower comparative purchase price
100 mm more reach
Same published repeatability
Approximately 6.3 kg lighter
Smaller listed footprint
1.5 m/s typical TCP speed
Strong I/O specification
Optional IP65 protection
Public U.S. pricing
Lower financial barrier for automation
Strong fit for small and medium manufacturers
KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 Advantages
One kilogram more rated payload
Integrated torque sensing in every axis
KUKA ARGUS safety architecture
KR C5 micro-2 controller
iiQKA.OS2 platform
iiQWorks simulation and engineering options
Strong industrial fieldbus integration
Established global KUKA ecosystem
Cleanroom model available separately
Strong fit for KUKA-standardized factories
FAIRINO FR10 Limitations
Smaller installed base than KUKA
Less benefit from standardization in an existing KUKA factory
Advanced force-controlled applications may require additional sensing or engineering
Maximum 14 kg figure is not equivalent to a 14 kg nominal payload
Exact optional software and fieldbus configurations must be confirmed
KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 Limitations
Significantly higher public marketplace price
100 mm less reach
Heavier arm
Larger listed footprint
No universal public U.S. price
Some communication or engineering features may require optional licenses
Warranty and lead time depend on the regional quotation
Public European pricing excludes VAT
Final Verdict
The FAIRINO FR10 is the stronger value-oriented choice for most applications that fit within a 10 kg rated payload. It costs $10,199, reaches 1,400 mm and matches the KUKA’s published ±0.05 mm repeatability. It is also lighter and offers a strong I/O specification.
For manufacturers seeking to automate machine tending, welding, handling, inspection, packaging or assembly at the lowest practical entry cost, the FR10 presents a compelling price-to-performance case.
The KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 is the more premium platform. Its one-kilogram payload advantage is relatively modest, but its integrated joint torque sensors, ARGUS safety architecture, KR C5 micro-2 controller and iiQKA ecosystem can provide meaningful value in advanced or standardized industrial environments.
The final decision can be summarized as follows:
Choose the FAIRINO FR10 for lower price, longer reach, comparable repeatability and faster potential ROI.
Choose the KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 for integrated torque sensing, KUKA ecosystem compatibility and premium industrial platform standardization.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does the FAIRINO FR10 cost?
FAIRINO USA publicly lists the FR10 at $10,199. Tooling, integration, safety equipment, freight and taxes may add to the complete system cost.
How much does the KUKA LBR iisy 11 R1300 cost?
Unchained Robotics publicly lists it at €29,705 excluding VAT. At an indicative exchange rate of approximately $1.139 per euro, that is roughly $33,835. This is not a guaranteed U.S. price.
Which robot has more payload?
The KUKA has an 11 kg rated payload, compared with 10 kg for the FAIRINO FR10. FAIRINO publishes a 14 kg maximum figure, while KUKA publishes a maximum of 11.72 kg at a 0 mm center of mass.
Which robot has longer reach?
The FAIRINO FR10 reaches 1,400 mm. The KUKA reaches 1,300 mm, giving the FR10 a 100 mm advantage.
Which robot has better repeatability?
They are tied. Both publish pose repeatability of ±0.05 mm.
Which robot is lighter?
The FR10 weighs approximately 40 kg, while the KUKA weighs approximately 46.3 kg.
Are both robots IP54 rated?
Yes. Both standard arms are listed at IP54. FAIRINO also offers an optional IP65 version.
Which robot has integrated joint torque sensors?
KUKA states that the LBR iisy has integrated torque sensors in every axis.
Which robot is better for machine tending?
The FR10 offers better value and 100 mm more reach. The KUKA may be preferable in a KUKA-standardized factory or where integrated torque sensing is important.
Which robot is better for welding?
The FR10 offers a lower-cost platform and longer reach. The KUKA provides a premium industrial ecosystem. The complete welding package and integration requirements should determine the final choice.
Which robot is better for palletizing?
Both can handle light palletizing. The KUKA provides one kilogram more rated payload, while the FR10 offers 100 mm more reach and a much lower acquisition price.
Does the robot price include the complete automation cell?
Not necessarily. Request a detailed quotation covering the controller, teach device, end effector, safety equipment, stand, software, engineering, installation, training and freight.
Can either cobot operate without safety fencing?
Potentially, but only after a formal risk assessment. The tool, workpiece, speed, payload and surrounding machinery determine whether additional guarding or safety scanners are required.
Which robot offers the better return on investment?
The FR10 may offer faster ROI because of its much lower purchase price. The KUKA may justify its premium when existing KUKA infrastructure reduces engineering, training and lifecycle-support costs.
